<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Home page in stead&#8211;the art of the home page</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netpoetic.com/2009/09/home-page-in-stead-the-art-of-the-home-page/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netpoetic.com/2009/09/home-page-in-stead-the-art-of-the-home-page/</link>
	<description>exploring digital poetry and electronic literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:19:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Andrews</title>
		<link>http://netpoetic.com/2009/09/home-page-in-stead-the-art-of-the-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netpoetic.com/?p=665#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Thanks; I installed Firebug. There is a very similar tool for Internet Explorer for the PC.

Concerning literary home pages, I think http://nobodyhere.com is one of my faves. It has distinct character. But it&#039;s hard to find stuff on the site. Should be searchable. 

Andy Campbell&#039;s homepage at http://www.dreamingmethods.com is enticing. Each piece is well-presented on the home page. And the page shows signs of graphical brain activity also. 

http://cmart.design.ru is a very well-done Russian home page that is erm partly literary. Conclave Obscurum is the site&#039;s name. 

My home page is very slowly wending toward being a work of art. But I also want it to be really good as a tool to nav and find stuff on the site. I need that in the home page because the site is big and you nav the site by repeatedly returning to the home page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks; I installed Firebug. There is a very similar tool for Internet Explorer for the PC.</p>
<p>Concerning literary home pages, I think <a href="http://nobodyhere.com" rel="nofollow">http://nobodyhere.com</a> is one of my faves. It has distinct character. But it&#8217;s hard to find stuff on the site. Should be searchable. </p>
<p>Andy Campbell&#8217;s homepage at <a href="http://www.dreamingmethods.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dreamingmethods.com</a> is enticing. Each piece is well-presented on the home page. And the page shows signs of graphical brain activity also. </p>
<p><a href="http://cmart.design.ru" rel="nofollow">http://cmart.design.ru</a> is a very well-done Russian home page that is erm partly literary. Conclave Obscurum is the site&#8217;s name. </p>
<p>My home page is very slowly wending toward being a work of art. But I also want it to be really good as a tool to nav and find stuff on the site. I need that in the home page because the site is big and you nav the site by repeatedly returning to the home page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Wilks</title>
		<link>http://netpoetic.com/2009/09/home-page-in-stead-the-art-of-the-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Wilks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netpoetic.com/?p=665#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s a mix and match affair, body class=”oneColFixCtrHdr” probably comes from the Sandbox theme (or maybe I started out with a very basic Dreamweaver template?)

TextWrangler is a free text editor for the Mac. Firebug is an incredibly useful web development tool that you can add on to the Firefox browser - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1843</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a mix and match affair, body class=”oneColFixCtrHdr” probably comes from the Sandbox theme (or maybe I started out with a very basic Dreamweaver template?)</p>
<p>TextWrangler is a free text editor for the Mac. Firebug is an incredibly useful web development tool that you can add on to the Firefox browser &#8211; <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1843" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/1843</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Andrews</title>
		<link>http://netpoetic.com/2009/09/home-page-in-stead-the-art-of-the-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netpoetic.com/?p=665#comment-225</guid>
		<description>OK. Looking at the source code of your homepage, i see some things that made me think blog, such as body class=&quot;oneColFixCtrHdr&quot;, ie, &#039;one fixed width column that is centered on the page and there is a header also&#039;, which are the sort of layout choices typically supported by blogs. i wouldn&#039;t have thought you&#039;d name a class that yourself. 

What is TextWrangler? And Firebug? Thanks for the tip on WAMP. I suppose I should install that on my windows system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. Looking at the source code of your homepage, i see some things that made me think blog, such as body class=&#8221;oneColFixCtrHdr&#8221;, ie, &#8216;one fixed width column that is centered on the page and there is a header also&#8217;, which are the sort of layout choices typically supported by blogs. i wouldn&#8217;t have thought you&#8217;d name a class that yourself. </p>
<p>What is TextWrangler? And Firebug? Thanks for the tip on WAMP. I suppose I should install that on my windows system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Wilks</title>
		<link>http://netpoetic.com/2009/09/home-page-in-stead-the-art-of-the-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Wilks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netpoetic.com/?p=665#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jim. My site combines a Wordpress blog with a &#039;regular&#039; static site that I designed and built using Fireworks and Dreamweaver. The homepage and all the works you mention above are actually in the static part of the site and only the blog section is Wordpress - although the blog contains all the pieces I&#039;ve made for remixworx.net so there&#039;s a lot of art/e-poetry content in there too. 

I wanted to blend both parts of the site into one design so it&#039;s probably resulted in a homepage that looks somewhat bloggish and a blog that doesn&#039;t look conventionally bloggish. The key was finding a background image that would work in both cases and I reproduced the top navigation in both parts of the site too.

I designed the static site in Dreamweaver and edited the Wordpress theme (which is based on the Sandbox theme) to match using a combination of TextWrangler (for Mac OS) and the Firebug extension for Firefox. I also use a MAMP (Mac - Apache - MySQL - PHP) local development environment to see how my WordPress theme works in action. (WAMP is the equivalent for Windows) 

Books that I found helpful in this regard were &#039;WordPress Theme Design&#039; by Tessa Blakely Silver (PACKT) and &#039;WordPress for Dummies&#039; by Lisa Sabin-Wilson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jim. My site combines a WordPress blog with a &#8216;regular&#8217; static site that I designed and built using Fireworks and Dreamweaver. The homepage and all the works you mention above are actually in the static part of the site and only the blog section is WordPress &#8211; although the blog contains all the pieces I&#8217;ve made for remixworx.net so there&#8217;s a lot of art/e-poetry content in there too. </p>
<p>I wanted to blend both parts of the site into one design so it&#8217;s probably resulted in a homepage that looks somewhat bloggish and a blog that doesn&#8217;t look conventionally bloggish. The key was finding a background image that would work in both cases and I reproduced the top navigation in both parts of the site too.</p>
<p>I designed the static site in Dreamweaver and edited the WordPress theme (which is based on the Sandbox theme) to match using a combination of TextWrangler (for Mac OS) and the Firebug extension for Firefox. I also use a MAMP (Mac &#8211; Apache &#8211; MySQL &#8211; PHP) local development environment to see how my WordPress theme works in action. (WAMP is the equivalent for Windows) </p>
<p>Books that I found helpful in this regard were &#8216;WordPress Theme Design&#8217; by Tessa Blakely Silver (PACKT) and &#8216;WordPress for Dummies&#8217; by Lisa Sabin-Wilson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Andrews</title>
		<link>http://netpoetic.com/2009/09/home-page-in-stead-the-art-of-the-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netpoetic.com/?p=665#comment-215</guid>
		<description>I just spent some time at  http://www.crissxross.net , Christina. I&#039;d read Fitting the Pattern previously, as you know. But I hadn&#039;t seen Tailspin, We Drank, or Glimpse before, and enjoyed them very much. 

I also noted that the whole site is a Wordpress blog. I hadn&#039;t noticed that when I initially and superficially visited the site. The homepage is not overtly bloggy. Although I suppose the  does indeed define the body of the homepage within a Wordpress one column, fixed width, centered page (with a header) template. Menu up top. But, still, it is not overtly bloggy in the impression it gives. 

It seems you have put a lot of effort into working within the Wordpress theme but trying also to broaden it out into a more site-like range. Congrats.

What are you using to edit the theme? I have noted that using Dreamweaver to edit a Wordpress theme is rather a lot less than WYSIWYG because of the PHP composition of the theme. 

So I have been using Artisteer. But it has its limitations. For instance, the Whitepress theme of netpoetic.com is not within the purview of Artisteer. The tabbed nature of the Whitepress theme, I mean, is not within the purview of the Artisteer editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spent some time at  <a href="http://www.crissxross.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.crissxross.net</a> , Christina. I&#8217;d read Fitting the Pattern previously, as you know. But I hadn&#8217;t seen Tailspin, We Drank, or Glimpse before, and enjoyed them very much. </p>
<p>I also noted that the whole site is a WordPress blog. I hadn&#8217;t noticed that when I initially and superficially visited the site. The homepage is not overtly bloggy. Although I suppose the  does indeed define the body of the homepage within a WordPress one column, fixed width, centered page (with a header) template. Menu up top. But, still, it is not overtly bloggy in the impression it gives. </p>
<p>It seems you have put a lot of effort into working within the WordPress theme but trying also to broaden it out into a more site-like range. Congrats.</p>
<p>What are you using to edit the theme? I have noted that using Dreamweaver to edit a WordPress theme is rather a lot less than WYSIWYG because of the PHP composition of the theme. </p>
<p>So I have been using Artisteer. But it has its limitations. For instance, the Whitepress theme of netpoetic.com is not within the purview of Artisteer. The tabbed nature of the Whitepress theme, I mean, is not within the purview of the Artisteer editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Wilks</title>
		<link>http://netpoetic.com/2009/09/home-page-in-stead-the-art-of-the-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Wilks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netpoetic.com/?p=665#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, the controls at the top left - I hadn&#039;t played with them before. I like the combination of functionality and playfulness and the sheer variety of ways to access the content. 

I agree, designing a blog feels like working in a factory. Collaborating and/or creating content for a blog feels quite different, one appreciates its usefulness - quite a helpful environment in fact... Although, why do comment input fields tend to be so cramped? To encourage brevity perhaps? In which case... I&#039;ll just say thanks, Jim, for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, the controls at the top left &#8211; I hadn&#8217;t played with them before. I like the combination of functionality and playfulness and the sheer variety of ways to access the content. </p>
<p>I agree, designing a blog feels like working in a factory. Collaborating and/or creating content for a blog feels quite different, one appreciates its usefulness &#8211; quite a helpful environment in fact&#8230; Although, why do comment input fields tend to be so cramped? To encourage brevity perhaps? In which case&#8230; I&#8217;ll just say thanks, Jim, for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Andrews</title>
		<link>http://netpoetic.com/2009/09/home-page-in-stead-the-art-of-the-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netpoetic.com/?p=665#comment-209</guid>
		<description>&quot;I worry that there are a vast number of gems buried deep in the blog that visitors may never find.&quot;

Yes. The form of the blog, at least most of those I&#039;ve seen, de-emphasize whatever is not recent on the blog. Although it&#039;s reachable via the &#039;archive&#039; or the search function. 

One could change that a bit by creating a page accessible from the main menu that highlighted some work from the archive. But the whole form of the blog is currently focussed temporally on the presentation of current work. Which is one of the reasons it can&#039;t be anything but. At the moment, anyway. Or no?

I&#039;m currently putting a blog together. Wordpress. Using a tool called Artisteer. I find it hard to get real excited about blog creation though. Feelin like a factory f f f f where&#039;s my godel yodel?

Had a look at  http://www.crissxross.net . It&#039;s lookin real good, Christina. Much more available than what I recall of the previous version. I don&#039;t recall Tailspin, for instance, and am looking forward to checking it out, along with much more I see on your home page that I haven&#039;t yet. 

Since I wrote the post on the homepage, I&#039;ve added a bit more functionality to the http://vispo.com homepage. The  controls at top left. These are for getting rid of the nav altogether and turning the background into foreground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I worry that there are a vast number of gems buried deep in the blog that visitors may never find.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. The form of the blog, at least most of those I&#8217;ve seen, de-emphasize whatever is not recent on the blog. Although it&#8217;s reachable via the &#8216;archive&#8217; or the search function. </p>
<p>One could change that a bit by creating a page accessible from the main menu that highlighted some work from the archive. But the whole form of the blog is currently focussed temporally on the presentation of current work. Which is one of the reasons it can&#8217;t be anything but. At the moment, anyway. Or no?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m currently putting a blog together. WordPress. Using a tool called Artisteer. I find it hard to get real excited about blog creation though. Feelin like a factory f f f f where&#8217;s my godel yodel?</p>
<p>Had a look at  <a href="http://www.crissxross.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.crissxross.net</a> . It&#8217;s lookin real good, Christina. Much more available than what I recall of the previous version. I don&#8217;t recall Tailspin, for instance, and am looking forward to checking it out, along with much more I see on your home page that I haven&#8217;t yet. </p>
<p>Since I wrote the post on the homepage, I&#8217;ve added a bit more functionality to the <a href="http://vispo.com" rel="nofollow">http://vispo.com</a> homepage. The  controls at top left. These are for getting rid of the nav altogether and turning the background into foreground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Wilks</title>
		<link>http://netpoetic.com/2009/09/home-page-in-stead-the-art-of-the-home-page/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Wilks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netpoetic.com/?p=665#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this, Jim. I really like your new design and I find things a lot more discoverable now. Your homepage is very inviting and I think that&#039;s also partly to do with the combination amongst your thumbnails of artwork/screenshots and human faces. The faces invite you in even if its one of the artwork thumbnails you may want to click on. Of course, in terms of &#039;covers&#039;, this is well known in magazine publishing. Faces on covers sell more issues. I wonder if faces on homepage designs such as yours result in more &#039;click-throughs&#039;?

I&#039;ve been thinking a lot about homepage design myself as I&#039;m in the process of redesigning my own for http://www.crissxross.net/ ...very slowly, in fits and starts. And there&#039;s the rub, every hour you spend redesigning your site is an hour not spent on creating new work or finishing work-in-progress. But then, if new work is too difficult to find or &#039;packaged&#039; in an off-putting way... 

As you say, a blog is, by design, easy to search and navigate, if it&#039;s a conventional blog, that is. I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s always the case with a creative collaborative blog like http://remixworx.net, especially with its arcane post titles. I worry that there are a vast number of gems buried deep in the blog that visitors may never find. It&#039;s something I hope to address (I&#039;m crissxross, one of the collaborators at remixworx) - but more on that later, I intend to write a piece about it which I&#039;ll post on netpoetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Jim. I really like your new design and I find things a lot more discoverable now. Your homepage is very inviting and I think that&#8217;s also partly to do with the combination amongst your thumbnails of artwork/screenshots and human faces. The faces invite you in even if its one of the artwork thumbnails you may want to click on. Of course, in terms of &#8216;covers&#8217;, this is well known in magazine publishing. Faces on covers sell more issues. I wonder if faces on homepage designs such as yours result in more &#8216;click-throughs&#8217;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot about homepage design myself as I&#8217;m in the process of redesigning my own for <a href="http://www.crissxross.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.crissxross.net/</a> &#8230;very slowly, in fits and starts. And there&#8217;s the rub, every hour you spend redesigning your site is an hour not spent on creating new work or finishing work-in-progress. But then, if new work is too difficult to find or &#8216;packaged&#8217; in an off-putting way&#8230; </p>
<p>As you say, a blog is, by design, easy to search and navigate, if it&#8217;s a conventional blog, that is. I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s always the case with a creative collaborative blog like <a href="http://remixworx.net" rel="nofollow">http://remixworx.net</a>, especially with its arcane post titles. I worry that there are a vast number of gems buried deep in the blog that visitors may never find. It&#8217;s something I hope to address (I&#8217;m crissxross, one of the collaborators at remixworx) &#8211; but more on that later, I intend to write a piece about it which I&#8217;ll post on netpoetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

